Critical-window emergence of autocatalytic sets under reaction-channel quotienting
Abstract
We determine the limiting probability that a reflexively autocatalytic and food-generated (RAF) set exists in the reversible binary-polymer model in the reaction convention used by the public generator of the finite-core theory of RAF emergence: two split descriptions and are identified precisely when . Molecules are the nonempty binary words of length at most , the food set consists of the six words of lengths one and two, and each molecule catalyses each reaction channel independently with probability , one mark serving both directions. Let be the mean number of channels catalysed by a molecule. For every sequence with the RAF probability converges to
where is the probability that ordinary reversible closure of the food set is unbounded in an infinite field of independent canonical channels of openness , and the probability of a RAF conditional on a catalysed food gateway converges to . This resolves the bulk-factor problem left open in the companion paper on exact gateway scaling.
The quotient map preserves closures and RAF witnesses deterministically, but it does not preserve homogeneous Bernoulli ensembles: independent split marks project to heterogeneous OR marks, and a four-molecule example shows that the split and quotient RAF probabilities differ at every parameter. The proof therefore works in the quotient model throughout. A half-openness domination transfers a supplied-seed growth estimate from the split model through fibres of size at most two; a record-word argument proves that unbounded closure generates every fixed word at the original openness; a uniform finite-seed approximation gives continuity of ; an exact law for complete catalytic peeling histories connects static closure to the finite catalytic model; and a bounded-catalyst gateway bound closes the upper estimate. We also prove that is nondecreasing and satisfies , where is the split-position survival function, so that as and as . The main theorem and its dependencies are formalised in Lean 4 with no axioms beyond the classical foundation; the few hand-proved comparison results are labelled as such. The results concern structural autocatalysis, not kinetic or thermodynamic viability.