Trustworthy decisions in stochastic amplification assays: timing limits, measurement design, and effective capacity
Abstract
Changing a readout time, adding an identity-sensitive measurement, increasing the reagent reserve, and improving the inference procedure solve different problems, and a laboratory that confuses them can spend its effort on a step that cannot succeed. We separate these problems for a finite pure-birth amplification source with Poisson loading, a latching detection threshold and an effective resource capacity. For the source at threshold five, every measurable randomized classifier of the complete crossing time that keeps blank error at most misses more than of loaded reactions; this all-rule obstruction, its concrete source identities and a source-preserving hit-and-identity repair with blank error below and miss below are verified in Lean 4. We then prove, with ordinary mathematics, that for any fixed sequential source with shared kinetics a deadline is optimal among all crossing-time classifiers; this converts every all-deadline exclusion into an all-classifier exclusion and sharpens the certified bound to . Using the holding-time representation of the crossing time we show that the obstruction is not a small-count artefact: for every integer threshold with the resource exhausted at detection, every crossing-time classifier at blank error misses more than , an explicit identity measurement misses less than , and doubling the capacity restores a usable deadline with errors below and . The proof replaces earlier Chebyshev allowances by gamma Chernoff and weighted Bernstein bounds and reduces the sufficient threshold from to . For the mechanism question we exhibit two capacities with exactly the same blank endpoint law, prove that calibrated intermediate observations recover capacity through clock-free ordered block ratios with strictly monotone, uniquely invertible ordering probabilities, extend the block theorem to non-exponential factorized holding times, and show that thresholds chosen as fractions of each reaction’s own plateau lose the leading capacity information. A signal-to-state interval construction and a censoring-safe confidence procedure that retains every incomplete observation complete an executable analysis. All performance statements are conditional mathematical results; no physical channel, calibration or biochemical resource is asserted to have been measured.