Abstract

Changing a readout time, adding an identity-sensitive measurement, increasing the reagent reserve, and improving the inference procedure solve different problems, and a laboratory that confuses them can spend its effort on a step that cannot succeed. We separate these problems for a finite pure-birth amplification source with Poisson loading, a latching detection threshold and an effective resource capacity. For the source at threshold five, every measurable randomized classifier of the complete crossing time that keeps blank error at most 1%1\% misses more than 5.55%5.55\% of loaded reactions; this all-rule obstruction, its concrete source identities and a source-preserving hit-and-identity repair with blank error below 0.03%0.03\% and miss below 4.22443%4.22443\% are verified in Lean 4. We then prove, with ordinary mathematics, that for any fixed sequential source with shared kinetics a deadline is optimal among all crossing-time classifiers; this converts every all-deadline exclusion into an all-classifier exclusion and sharpens the certified bound to 6.9%6.9\%. Using the holding-time representation of the crossing time we show that the obstruction is not a small-count artefact: for every integer threshold h106h\ge10^{6} with the resource exhausted at detection, every crossing-time classifier at 1%1\% blank error misses more than 5.63%5.63\%, an explicit identity measurement misses less than 4.13%4.13\%, and doubling the capacity restores a usable deadline with errors below 0.9373%0.9373\% and 4.8732%4.8732\%. The proof replaces earlier Chebyshev allowances by gamma Chernoff and weighted Bernstein bounds and reduces the sufficient threshold from 10810^{8} to 10610^{6}. For the mechanism question we exhibit two capacities with exactly the same blank endpoint law, prove that calibrated intermediate observations recover capacity through clock-free ordered block ratios with strictly monotone, uniquely invertible ordering probabilities, extend the block theorem to non-exponential factorized holding times, and show that thresholds chosen as fractions of each reaction’s own plateau lose the leading capacity information. A signal-to-state interval construction and a censoring-safe confidence procedure that retains every incomplete observation complete an executable analysis. All performance statements are conditional mathematical results; no physical channel, calibration or biochemical resource is asserted to have been measured.